vote Jump platforms to ComentariosDiego Sanz Paratcha Aliens Act and asylum. NEW ATTACK ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND THE CRISIS OF THE SPEECHES security regimes Fondoa sack In June the Government proceed with the support of the PP a new Asylum Law. This month has launched the debate on amendments to the Immigration Bill by the Government, in a process that the Executive expects to close in late ano.Ambas again tighten regulations and restrictive policies and to limit criticism and punishment freedom of movement. elephant Previous
To say that these templates are spam is like saying that the blue links between articles election are SPAM. All in house, Wikipedia, and here there republican is no benefit to the community outside, but a feedback.
What if I agree george w. bush on is campaign that the templates are for the most ugly, too big headquarters for the little information they provide, but that's another platform song (can be reduced to allow a single line or even drop them).
As I understand, these templates are useful for the topic of Wikipedia 1.0, but could also be done with lists of items (as Dodo said) or kerry putting the plan into wikiproject categories. That is, instead of placing templates 5000 "wikiproject music" album in all, we can put 100 templates, one for each category of year of the twentieth century music, Category: 1974 albums, etc ... and save, because normally senator it is for each category one or more wikiproject, and there are no george bush categories (I think) with 20 of articles resulting from a project, and another 35 , etc..
If you give this case could go without the templates, and hand that makes the template (or should do), views and categorize the discussion of the article. We would have discussions of the articles in categories that could be used as maintenance Wikipedia Wikiproject and 1.0, and we remove templates have color on top of the talk page.
On the other hand, if the templates again wikificar)) ((((references)))) ((noneutral or not bother, I think because I do not swallow huge 4 posters, I do the scroll down unnecessarily, but when these templates serve only voter to employees (which will be a very small percentage of the total that Wikipedia uses). I think that keeping these templates, so they are, should go in the discussions. Emijrp senate (disc) 12:15 22 may 2007 (CEST) PD: What is this survey 'Do Have Value
No, Emilio: The end does not justify the means. For the same reason, can I sign the papers to which I contribute 'Total: all is well at home and get a "feedback" telling people that this article is of issues interest to me.
On the other hand, has proposed a very interesting take classes, which either already exist or often produces an extra to the project when inserted, to locate items within the domain of a wikiproject. In fact, above Richy has suggested using templates "transparent" (or "invisible"), almost one category, but this does not bring politics any benefit in the discussion page, with only extra work to feed the bot. parties Is there any objection '
Returning to the templates you mention (and whether or not the subject of this survey), the philosophy behind them is that they congress are temporary (or to withdraw sooner or later) and indicate "defects" of the article are planted where, so was considered to be committee as visible as possible: VOTING erase problems of neutrality, style, etcetera. However, we can discuss whether it is necessary that these staff are so visible (can be more sober and planted at the end political of the article, like the wikiconcurso) or that they are at all, for everyone or only for the anonymous (you could by CSS to make them visible only to registered users, but why can not an article wikificar an anonymous').
In fact, right here is the problem. It has been thought necessary to call attention to certain problems or issues (delete item with voting under way, protected, discussion, etc.) but garish paintings bother, so we seek solutions that are less intrusive to those who are not too important (as already mentioned the liberal wikiconcurso or semiprotegida2 () ()) and "prohibits" to the talk page abortion completely dispensable (wikiproject). I am in favor of minimizing the articles on everything other than content, so I can look for more discreet conservative ways to bring an item is locked, does not have a suitable format, etcetera. - Dodo 19:17 22 may 2007 (CEST) PD: As you are back to say "down" wash your mouth out with soap.
Just two quick notes: The idea of the templates "transparent" Dodo is not me (to stop that which is Caesar's) and the template (visible or not) on the discussion page is a technically better solution list or a category for reasons too long to explain here and it seems that almost no interest to anyone. Regards, Richy - comments' 11:11 23 may 2007 (CEST)
A mi me if interested, particularly against the categories and why seem obvious problems caused by massive use of templates. Bais Yaakov Of Midwood was founded by Rabbi Milton Balkany is involved in both democratic and republican parties I disagree, of course.
| Related Products | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | |||
| The Opinion Makers: An Insider Exposes the Truth Behind beliefs the Polls by David W. Moore (Kindle Edition - Aug 12, 2008) - Kindle Book | Polls and Politics: The Dilemmas of Democracy by Michael A. Genovese and Matthew J. Streb (Hardcover - May 2004) | Tides of republicans Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics by James A. Stimson (Kindle Edition - Sep 13, 2004) - Kindle Book | |||
Recent Comments